High levels of inorganic compounds in groundwater represent a significant problem in many parts of the world, with major economic, social and environmental drawbacks. The natural composition of groundwater derives mainly from the water–rock interactions, both in the vadose and saturated zone, but also depends on the biological and physicochemical processes, the residence time and the initial composition of the recharge water. Contamination from industrial, agricultural and urban areas often overlaps with the natural features of groundwater, and the assessment of the impact of anthropogenic activities might be challenging. The distinction between natural and anthropogenic components that determine groundwater chemistry is a fundamental issue in groundwater management, particularly when the concentration of inorganic compounds exceeds the threshold values set for the evaluation of the good chemical status of groundwater bodies, as requested by many environmental regulations, including the EuropeanWater Framework and Groundwater Directives. In order to reach the good status of groundwater, natural background levels (NBLs) assessment of chemical species in groundwater is needed to clearly define the environmental objectives for groundwater bodies as well as the remediation targets for contaminated sites. A variety of methodologies have been adopted by different countries to assess the NBLs of chemical species in groundwater that are potential pollutants and may be hazardous for human health and groundwater-dependent ecosystems (GDE). In Europe, the research efforts over the last 20 years have been dedicated to the elaboration of common standardized methodologies for the derivation of groundwater NBLs through the development of dedicated joint projects: from BASELINE (“Natural Baseline Quality in European Aquifers: a basis for aquifer management”) to BRIDGE (“Background criteria for the identification of groundwater thresholds”), arriving to the ongoing project HOVER (“Hydrogeological processes and Geological settings over Europe controlling dissolved geogenic and anthropogenic elements in groundwater of relevance to human health and the status of dependent ecosystems”). The continuous improvement in methodologies, tools and approaches for estimating groundwater NBLs has inspired this Special Issue, which aims to provide new insights into how NBLs are defined in different regions of the world, and to provide an update on the methods and approaches used to derive NBL at different spatial scales: site-specific, catchment, regional, national or transboundary scales. The main goal of this Special Issue of Water is to bring together and discuss different methodological approaches and tools to improve the assessment of groundwater NBLs.

Natural background levels in groundwater

Preziosi E
Primo
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2021

Abstract

High levels of inorganic compounds in groundwater represent a significant problem in many parts of the world, with major economic, social and environmental drawbacks. The natural composition of groundwater derives mainly from the water–rock interactions, both in the vadose and saturated zone, but also depends on the biological and physicochemical processes, the residence time and the initial composition of the recharge water. Contamination from industrial, agricultural and urban areas often overlaps with the natural features of groundwater, and the assessment of the impact of anthropogenic activities might be challenging. The distinction between natural and anthropogenic components that determine groundwater chemistry is a fundamental issue in groundwater management, particularly when the concentration of inorganic compounds exceeds the threshold values set for the evaluation of the good chemical status of groundwater bodies, as requested by many environmental regulations, including the EuropeanWater Framework and Groundwater Directives. In order to reach the good status of groundwater, natural background levels (NBLs) assessment of chemical species in groundwater is needed to clearly define the environmental objectives for groundwater bodies as well as the remediation targets for contaminated sites. A variety of methodologies have been adopted by different countries to assess the NBLs of chemical species in groundwater that are potential pollutants and may be hazardous for human health and groundwater-dependent ecosystems (GDE). In Europe, the research efforts over the last 20 years have been dedicated to the elaboration of common standardized methodologies for the derivation of groundwater NBLs through the development of dedicated joint projects: from BASELINE (“Natural Baseline Quality in European Aquifers: a basis for aquifer management”) to BRIDGE (“Background criteria for the identification of groundwater thresholds”), arriving to the ongoing project HOVER (“Hydrogeological processes and Geological settings over Europe controlling dissolved geogenic and anthropogenic elements in groundwater of relevance to human health and the status of dependent ecosystems”). The continuous improvement in methodologies, tools and approaches for estimating groundwater NBLs has inspired this Special Issue, which aims to provide new insights into how NBLs are defined in different regions of the world, and to provide an update on the methods and approaches used to derive NBL at different spatial scales: site-specific, catchment, regional, national or transboundary scales. The main goal of this Special Issue of Water is to bring together and discuss different methodological approaches and tools to improve the assessment of groundwater NBLs.
2021
Istituto di Ricerca Sulle Acque - IRSA
NBL
Threshold Values
Groundwater Directive
Inorganic compounds
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
prod_458591-doc_178310.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Natural Background Levels in Groundwater
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 186.02 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
186.02 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14243/395868
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact