We previously published a series of 8-methoxypirazolo[1,5-a]quinazolines (PQs) and their 4,5-dihydro derivatives (4,5(H)PQ) bearing the (hetero)arylalkylester group at position 3 as ligands at the -aminobutyric type A (GABA(A)) subtype receptor. Continuing the study in this field, we report here the design and synthesis of 3-(hetero)arylpyrazolo[1,5-a]quinazoline and 3-(hetero)aroylpyrazolo[1,5-a]quinazoline 8-methoxy substituted as interesting analogs of the above (hetero)arylalkylester, in which the shortening or the removal of the linker between the 3-(hetero)aryl ring and the PQ was performed. Only compounds that are able to inhibit radioligand binding by more than 80% at 10 M have been selected for electrophysiological studies on recombinant 122L GABA(A) receptors. Some compounds show a promising profile. For example, compounds 6a and 6b are able to modulate the GABA(A)R in an opposite manner, since 6b enhances and 6a reduces the variation of the chlorine current, suggesting that they act as a partial agonist and an inverse partial agonist, respectively. The most potent derivative was 3-(4-methoxyphenylcarbonyl)-8-methoxy-4,5-dihydropyrazolo[1,5-a] quinazoline 11d, which reaches a maximal activity at 1 M (+54%), and it enhances the chlorine current at 0.01 M. Finally, compound 6g, acting as a null modulator at 122L, shows the ability to antagonize the full agonist diazepam and the potentiation of CGS 9895 on the new +/- non-traditional' benzodiazepine site.

1-Methylpyrazolo[1,2-a]benzo[1,2,3,4]tetrazin-3-ones 4, synthesized in good to excellent yields, were designed as novel alkylating agents because of their peculiar chemical behavior. All derivatives showed antiproliferative activity against more than 50 types of tumor cell lines with GI50 reaching sub-micromolar values. SAR studies revealed that the presence of a chlorine atom is well-tolerated in both positions 8 and 9, whereas in the case of the methyl group, switching from the 8 to the 9 position gives rise to the most active compound of the series, 4g, either for the number of cell lines inhibited and for selectivity against leukaemia and renal cancer subpanels. COMPARE and 3D-MIND computations indicate, for compounds 4, an activity profile analogous to rifamycins and cytidine analogues.